Why RBAC Alone Isn’t Enough for Complex Applications
Modern Permission Models Explained
How Oso Simplifies Complex Permission Management
Implementing Flexible Permission Logic with Oso
Deployment and Integration: Making Authorization Work for You
As applications grow in complexity, traditional Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) often falls short of meeting nuanced authorization needs. Developers face challenges managing permissions that must adapt to dynamic user attributes, resource contexts, and evolving business rules. This gap calls for modern permission management approaches that go beyond static roles to deliver flexible, scalable, and performant authorization.
At Oso, we provide authorization as a service designed to meet these challenges. Our authorization language, Polar, supports multiple access control models—including RBAC, Relationship-Based Access Control (ReBAC), and Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC)—while integrating seamlessly with your existing databases. Oso offers a deterministic, testable framework with sub-10 millisecond latency that fits the needs of complex applications.
Here’s what we’ll cover:
RBAC organizes permissions into roles, which are then assigned to users to grant access rights. This model works well for straightforward scenarios but breaks down in fine-grained or context-dependent policies. For example, consider an app where access depends not only on a user’s role but also on attributes like department, project membership, or time of day.
Static roles can lead to role explosion—where the number of roles grows unwieldy as the number of permission combinations increases. This complexity makes managing and auditing permissions difficult, increasing the risk of errors or security gaps.
Modern applications demand permission management that adapts dynamically to user attributes, resource properties, and environmental conditions. This need has driven the adoption of more expressive models like ABAC and ReBAC.
ABAC evaluates access based on attributes of users, resources, and the environment. For example, a policy might allow access only if a user’s department matches the resource’s department and the request occurs during business hours.
This model offers fine-grained control without proliferating roles. It supports complex, context-aware policies that reflect real-world business logic.
ReBAC bases permissions on relationships between entities, such as users, groups, and resources. For instance, a user may access a document if they are a member of the project team that owns it.
ReBAC is especially useful in social networks, collaboration tools, and multi-tenant systems where relationships define access boundaries.
PBAC centralizes authorization logic into policies that specify conditions for access. These policies can combine roles, attributes and relationships, enabling sophisticated rules like “finance team members can access reports only during business hours.”
Centralized authorization policies are essential in modern applications, whose functionality may be defined across multiple application tiers, containerized services and even serverless functions.
Modern applications often blend RBAC, ABAC, and ReBAC to balance simplicity and expressiveness. RBAC handles broad access categories, while ABAC and ReBAC refine permissions based on context and relationships.
Oso supports these models natively, allowing you to express policies declaratively and enforce them efficiently. Here’s how Oso stands out:
Consider a scenario where you want to allow users to edit documents only if they belong to the same team and the document is not archived. With Oso, you can express this logic clearly:
allow(user:User, "view", document:Document) if has_relation(user, "team", _team) and has_relation(document, "team", _team) and not is_archived(document);
This policy combines user attributes and resource state without creating new roles for every possible combination. Oso evaluates this efficiently, returning a simple yes/no answer.
You can also incorporate relationships, such as allowing access if a user is a manager of the document owner:
allow(user:User, "view", document:Document) if has_relation(_owner, "manager", user) and has_relation(document, "owner", _owner);
This flexibility supports evolving business rules without rewriting your entire permission system.
Oso’s ability to integrate with your existing Postgres database schema means you don’t have to restructure your data or maintain separate data stores. This reduces operational overhead and keeps authorization aligned with your application state.
Moreover, this lets you run authorization close to your data, minimizing exposure and meeting strict regulatory requirements.
RBAC remains a useful foundation, but modern applications require permission management that adapts to complex, dynamic contexts. Models like ABAC and ReBAC provide this flexibility, but implementing them efficiently is challenging.
Oso offers a robust authorization service that supports multiple models, incorporates local application data, and delivers low-latency, local authorization. Its deterministic framework makes policies testable and maintainable, while deployment flexibility meets diverse infrastructure needs.
If you’re building complex apps and want a permission management solution that scales with your business logic, Oso provides the tools and expertise to get it right.
Explore Oso’s documentation to see how you can implement modern authorization in your applications today.